This page lists every Orange Pill Wiki entry hyperlinked from Martha Woodmansee — On AI. 20 entries total. Each is a deeper-dive on a person, concept, work, event, or technology that the book treats as a stepping stone for thinking through the AI revolution. Click any card to open the entry; in each entry, words colored in orange link to other Orange Pill Wiki entries, while orange-underlined words with the Wikipedia mark link to Wikipedia.
The pre-Romantic doctrine — codified by Horace and Quintilian, dominant in Western literary theory for two millennia — that treated creative imitation of established models as the discipline of mastery rather than the confession of inadequa…
The network of editors, collaborators, research assistants, and institutional contributors whose labor produces what the Romantic framework credits to a single named author.
The central information-management technology of the early modern period — a personal knowledge architecture constructed through selection, organization, and generative use, and the conceptual ancestor of contemporary AI curation.
The constructive program that emerges on the ground cleared by Woodmansee's critique — transparent, collaborative, evaluated by quality rather than origin, and organized around the cultivation of judgment, voice, and responsibility.
The humanist practice of commonplace books, encyclopedias, and scholarly collections — valued for curation, judgment, and organizational intelligence rather than for Romantic originality.
The foundational copyright doctrine — descended from Fichte — that protects the specific form of a text while leaving its underlying ideas in the public domain.
The pre-authorial transmitter — valued for fidelity rather than originality — whose understanding of textual production would be unintelligible to the Romantic author and perfectly legible to Claude.
The pre-modern economic arrangement — aristocratic patrons commissioning and sustaining writers in exchange for literary production — whose collapse in the eighteenth century created the ownership problem that Romantic authorship was invent…
The account of what the creative experience actually feels like when the Romantic mystifications are set aside — the felt experience of ownership preserved, its metaphysical interpretation abandoned.
The invented idea — late-eighteenth-century in origin — that a text originates in an individual author's unique consciousness and therefore belongs to that individual as intellectual property.
The central unresolved legal and ethical problem of AI production — whether the use of copyrighted works as training data constitutes infringement, a new form of enclosure, or something the existing copyright framework cannot adequately cla…
The Romantic framework's institutional defense — works generated by AI without human creative control are ineligible for copyright — which is internally coherent and increasingly untenable.
Johann Gottlieb Fichte's 1793 essay supplying the philosophical architecture — the idea/expression distinction — that enabled copyright to function as a property regime for intellectual goods.
The eighteenth-century collaborative masterwork of Diderot and d'Alembert — arguably the most influential publication of the Enlightenment and a paradigm case of collective intellectual production that the Romantic framework cannot comfort…
Edo Segal's 2026 book on the Claude Code moment and the AI transition — the empirical ground and narrative framework on which the Festinger volume builds its diagnostic reading.
The 1710 British Parliamentary statute conventionally described as the first modern copyright law — and the conceptual revolution whose philosophical justification had not yet been written when it was enacted.
Edward Young's 1759 treatise introducing the vegetable metaphor — original work grows spontaneously from the vital root of genius — that became the founding document of Romantic authorship theory.