Every system operates within constraints. A rabbit population grows exponentially when grass is abundant, but the meadow has a finite quantity of grass; when population exceeds carrying capacity, the system overshoots, grass is consumed faster than it regenerates, and the population crashes. The carrying capacity of the AI ecosystem is not a physical resource but a human one: the cognitive, emotional, and relational capacity of the people who work within the system. The reinforcing loop is drawing on this capacity the way rabbits draw on grass, and the system is approaching overshoot because the loop is accelerating while human regeneration happens at biologically fixed rates.
The signs of overshoot are the signs the Berkeley researchers documented: burnout that manifests not as dramatic collapse but as progressive erosion — reduced empathy, flattened affect, quiet withdrawal of engagement that precedes visible symptoms by months or years. These are not individual failures of resilience. They are system-level indicators of a resource being consumed at a rate exceeding its regeneration. The meadow is turning brown at the margins while the rabbits continue to multiply.
The temporal dimension of the overshoot makes it particularly dangerous. A depleted fishery produces visible consequences within seasons; communities suffer observably; political pressure builds. A depleted cognitive commons produces invisible consequences over years. The expertise is not built, but the absence of expertise that was never acquired does not register as loss the way disappearance of previously abundant fish does. The depletion is measured in what does not exist — and what does not exist is, almost by definition, invisible to the systems that monitor what does.
The asymmetry between immediate visible benefits and delayed invisible costs is among the most dangerous features of any system governed by an unconstrained reinforcing loop. The metrics rise. Output increases. Competitive position improves. Everything measurable points upward. But the carrying capacity is being consumed beneath the measurement threshold, and by the time consumption becomes visible — the workforce visibly depleted, the expertise gap too wide to bridge — the system has overshot, and the correction will be more painful than prevention would have been.
The concept translates ecological carrying capacity, central to The Limits to Growth, into the cognitive domain. Meadows's World3 model treated population, industry, food, resources, and pollution as interacting stocks and flows; the same stock-and-flow apparatus applies to cognitive capacity, with inflows (deliberate practice, reflection, rest, diverse exposure) and outflows (intensified work, displaced struggle, colonized attention, homogenized approaches).
Finite resource. Human cognitive capacity is bounded by biology and renews at biologically fixed rates.
Overshoot dynamic. When consumption exceeds regeneration, the system overshoots before the depletion is visible.
Invisible depletion. What is lost is the expertise never built, the question never asked — absences invisible to metrics tracking what exists.
Delay asymmetry. Benefits precede costs by years; by the time costs manifest, the trajectory is difficult to reverse.
Biological vs algorithmic speed. The reinforcing loop accelerates while human regeneration holds constant, guaranteeing eventual crisis without balancing intervention.