The book's central chapters address specific questions about consciousness — the nature of self, the structure of dream experience, the minimal self revealed in deep meditation, the phenomenology of dying — with equal attention to neuroscientific data and contemplative first-person reports. The methodological commitment is neurophenomenological: neither perspective is privileged, and each is used to refine and constrain the other.
The book's relevance to the AI debate is less direct than Mind in Life, but it deepens the enactive framework's claim that consciousness is an embodied, lived process whose variations across states of wakefulness, dreaming, and meditation cannot be captured by computational models. The minimal self that remains in deep meditation — the pure witness consciousness of the Upanishadic tradition — is still an embodied phenomenon, sustained by the living organism's autopoietic activity even when its ordinary discursive structure has been suspended. No computational system has anything analogous.
The book also represents Thompson's most sustained engagement with his contemplative heritage. His engagement with Buddhist philosophy, begun in childhood at the Lindisfarne Association where his father William Irwin Thompson had founded a community of scientific and contemplative inquiry, reaches its most developed form in the book's integration of Western cognitive science with Eastern philosophy of mind.
Published by Columbia University Press in 2015. The book extends Thompson's earlier work on the enactive approach and draws extensively on Buddhist and Hindu philosophical traditions that Thompson has studied since childhood.
Consciousness spans states. The enactive framework applies to waking, dreaming, and deep sleep, not only to ordinary cognition.
Contemplative traditions produce data. Disciplined first-person investigation generates findings that constrain neuroscience.
The minimal self is embodied. Even in deep meditation, consciousness is sustained by autopoietic activity.
Dying illuminates living. The book's chapter on death extends the framework into territory computational models cannot address.