You On AI Encyclopedia · The Contemporary Luddites The You On AI Encyclopedia Home
Txt Low Med High
CONCEPT

The Contemporary Luddites

The artists, writers, actors, and engineers who have raised specific, articulate grievances about AI deployment — and whose dismissal as Luddites performs the same delegitimating function the original label performed two centuries ago.
The artists who protested the use of their work to train image generators were not Luddites, though the label was applied with reflexive contempt. The writers who petitioned against the scraping of their books were not Luddites. The actors who struck over the use of their likenesses were not Luddites. The engineers who raised concerns about AI governance were not Luddites. Each group had a specific, articulate, and entirely rational grievance — and what they shared was not a common technology or industry but a common political condition: exclusion from the governance of decisions that affect their lives. The application of the Luddite label served in each case the same function it served against the framework knitters: the delegitimation of dissent through the imputation of ignorance.
The Contemporary Luddites
The Contemporary Luddites

In The You On AI Encyclopedia

The artists' grievance is a consent grievance. Sarah Andersen's webcomic style was scraped without permission and used to train Stable Diffusion, which could then produce images "in the style of Sarah Andersen" competing with her for commissions her years of work had built. The labor was taken without consent to build a tool that would devalue that labor — the framework knitters' situation exactly.

The writers' grievance extends the property question into language itself. The Books3 dataset contained approximately 196,000 books obtained from shadow libraries without author permission. The Authors Guild letter signed by over ten thousand writers demanded consent, credit, and compensation — the mildest conceivable remedies for a violation that, had it been performed against any other kind of property, would have produced criminal prosecution.

Luddite Response
Luddite Response

The actors' grievance reaches beyond the economic to the bodily. During the 2023 SAG-AFTRA negotiations, studios proposed contract language permitting them to scan a background performer's likeness in a single session and use the digital replica in any future production, in perpetuity, for a single day's pay. The actors' resistance was not to digital effects but to the proposition that a person's physical appearance could be captured, owned, and deployed without ongoing consent or compensation.

The engineers' grievance is internal to the industry and politically complex. Engineers at major AI companies have raised concerns about pace of deployment, adequacy of safety testing, and governance of systems whose capabilities expand faster than understanding. Several have left positions to raise concerns publicly, at significant personal cost. Their grievance is about governance — the concentration of world-shaping decisions in a small number of executives whose competitive incentives are not aligned with broader public interest.

Origin

The framing emerges from applying Thompson's analytical categories to contemporary AI resistance — in particular, his recovery of the framework knitters' specific grievances from beneath the dismissive label that concealed them.

Key Ideas

Specific grievances, not technophobia. Each group has a specific political grievance about terms of deployment, not a general opposition to the technology.

Framework Knitters
Framework Knitters

Common political condition. What they share is exclusion from governance of decisions affecting their lives — the same condition Thompson identified in the original Luddites.

Consent as central issue. For artists, writers, and actors, the core violation is the use of labor or likeness without consent — a consent that could have been obtained but was not.

Governance grievance for engineers. For those inside the industry, the grievance concerns who makes decisions about world-shaping technology and in whose interest.

In The You On AI Book

This concept surfaces across 2 chapters of You On AI. Each passage below links back into the book at the exact page.
Chapter 8 The Luddites Page 1 · The Night They Broke the Looms
…anchored on "We call them Luddites now, and we use the word as an insult"
We call them Luddites now, and we use the word as an insult. A Luddite is a person who is afraid of technology, who resists progress, who cannot adapt. The word has become shorthand for a specific kind of stubborn obsolescence, the…
A Luddite is a person who is afraid of technology, who resists progress, who cannot adapt. This is a profound misreading of history.
Read this passage in the book →
Chapter 15 The Boulder, the Believer, and the Beaver Page 1 · The Boulder
…anchored on "the Boulder is trapped in a delusion"
But the Boulder is trapped in a delusion: the belief that it can actually hold indefinitely. It cannot. The water does not break the Boulder by hitting it head-on. The water goes around, and then underneath, and then at the banks it sits…
There are three ways to stand in the river.
Refusal is its own kind of power abdication.
Read this passage in the book →

Further Reading

  1. Brian Merchant, Blood in the Machine (Little, Brown, 2023)
  2. Matteo Pasquinelli, The Eye of the Master (Verso, 2023)
  3. Kate Crawford, Atlas of AI (Yale University Press, 2021)
Explore more
Browse the full You On AI Encyclopedia — over 8,500 entries
← Home 0%
CONCEPT Book →