Maslow derived the B-values empirically, by asking self-actualizing people what they found intrinsically compelling about their work and lives. The answers clustered. Truth-seeking was reported as a value in itself, not a means to accurate prediction. Beauty was pursued for its own sake, not for its utility. Justice was pursued because injustice felt wrong in the body, not because justice had strategic advantages. These were Being values in the strict sense: ends rather than means.
The list is not exhaustive and Maslow revised it across his career. What mattered was the structural claim: that a certain class of value exists which is not reducible to D-motivation, which self-actualizing people pursue as intrinsically worthwhile, and whose frustration produces what Maslow called metapathologies — sicknesses of meaning that do not appear on conventional diagnostic scales.
In the AI context, the B-values do the work that no technical specification can. Two products can be functionally equivalent; one can be beautiful, whole, and true, the other merely adequate. The difference is not in the code or the prose or the design but in what the maker brought to the process — the values that guided the thousand small decisions no specification captured. AI can execute within specifications. It cannot supply the values that distinguish the beautiful from the adequate, and in an age of abundant adequate production, the beautiful becomes structurally scarce in the Smithian sense.
This is, in the book's reading, what worthy of amplification means in the most precise form. The signal worth amplifying is a signal shaped by B-values. The signal not worth amplifying — the signal that produces output at scale while eroding meaning — is shaped by D-values. The amplifier cannot tell the difference. The culture downstream of the amplifier will register the difference only slowly, as the population of B-value-shaped work becomes proportionally smaller in the total volume of production.
Maslow developed the B-values list across Religions, Values, and Peak-Experiences (1964) and The Farther Reaches of Human Nature (1971). The underlying concept — that there exist values which are not reducible to need-satisfaction — drew on philosophical traditions from Plato through G.E. Moore.
The list's structural resemblance to classical virtue ethics is not accidental; Maslow read widely in philosophy and understood his work as an empirical complement to philosophical ethics rather than a replacement for it.
B-values are ends, not means. They are pursued because they are experienced as intrinsically worthwhile.
Their frustration produces metapathologies. The sicknesses of meaning — cynicism, ennui, nihilism — that Maslow named and the AI age has made epidemic.
AI cannot supply them. The tool executes; values come from the maker.
In an age of abundant adequacy, they become the scarce resource. Everything the market needs becomes common; what remains valuable is what the market cannot generate.
Critics have questioned whether Maslow's B-values are genuinely universal or culturally specific — whether, in particular, they reflect mid-twentieth-century Western humanist preferences dressed as psychological findings. The AI discussion has not resolved this; it has raised the stakes, since the question of which values to build into amplifying systems now has practical consequences that exceed any empirical settlement.