Say's original formulation was subtle; its caricatured version — 'supply creates its own demand' — is the one Keynes attacked. The attack demonstrated that the circular flow (production → income → demand → production) could break down through liquidity preference, through the paradox of thrift, or through collapses in animal spirits that transformed expected investment into hoarding.
The AI reapplication is exact. When the cost of producing software approaches zero, the supply of software explodes. Classical logic predicts that this supply should generate corresponding demand — more products, more choices, more economic activity. What actually happened was the Software Death Cross: a trillion dollars of market value vanished from software companies within weeks as the market recognized that producing software was no longer a durable source of value.
The mechanism is Keynesian. The income that software production used to generate — developer salaries, implementation consulting fees, platform licensing revenue — evaporates as AI tools replace the labor that generated it. The consumers whose spending absorbed software output lose the employment income that enabled their spending. Supply expanded; demand did not follow. The circular flow broke down precisely as Keynes predicted.
The Keynesian prescription for the AI economy is to recognize — as classical economists of the 1930s eventually did — that supply does not automatically create demand, and that the institutions which convert production to prosperity must be deliberately constructed.
Say formalized the law in his Treatise on Political Economy (1803). Keynes's demolition occupies Book I of the General Theory (1936).
Production generates income. Every unit of supply creates income through wages, profits, and rents.
Circular flow assumption. Classical logic assumes income flows back into demand at the same rate it was generated.
Hoarding breaks the flow. Income can be saved rather than spent, breaking the automatic conversion of supply into demand.
AI commoditization. Near-zero-cost production concentrates income and compresses the employment base that sustains demand.
Institutional response. Converting abundant supply into abundant value requires institutions that Say's Law assumed away.