This page lists every Orange Pill Wiki entry hyperlinked from Mary Midgley — On AI. 21 entries total. Each is a deeper-dive on a person, concept, work, event, or technology that the book treats as a stepping stone for thinking through the AI revolution. Click any card to open the entry; in each entry, words colored in orange link to other Orange Pill Wiki entries, while orange-underlined words with the Wikipedia mark link to Wikipedia.
The governing metaphor of The Orange Pill — AI as a signal-amplifier that carries whatever is fed into it further, with terrifying fidelity. Buber's framework extends the metaphor: the amplifier clarifies what was already there, which makes…
Midgley's load-bearing distinction — calculating power versus acting as a whole being with a coherent sense of what matters — the framework that reveals what AI has and what it categorically lacks.
The quality of subjective experience — being aware, being something it is like to be — and the single deepest unanswered question in both philosophy of mind and AI.
The research tradition — converging from neuroscience, philosophy, and robotics — that mind is not separable from body, and whose empirical maturity over four decades has made the computational theory of mind increasingly hard to defend.
The four ideological structures — techno-optimism, techno-pessimism, techno-determinism, human exceptionalism — that constrain AI discourse by appearing to be features of reality rather than positions within it.
The hypothesis that accelerating intelligence — biological, technological, or both — could reach a trajectory so steep that human institutions cannot track it. Condorcet formalized it in 1794, making him the first singularity theorist by ne…
Midgley's signature method — the unglamorous work of crawling under the conceptual house to find where the pipes have gone wrong and everything downstream has been contaminated.
Midgley's defence of the obvious — that the physicist's sunset and the poet's sunset are both real, and that the reductionist insistence on a single vocabulary produces impoverished understanding.
The twelve-year-old's question — 'Mom, what am I for?' — that Midgley's framework identifies as the deepest exercise of the rarest capacity in the known universe.
The Orange Pill's image for the set of professional and cultural assumptions so familiar they have become invisible — the water one breathes, the glass that shapes what one sees. A modern rendering of Smith's worry about the narrowing effe…
The persistent cognitive habit of smuggling a little person into the machine to explain how the machine does what it does — installed by the observer, not discovered in the system.
Midgley's concept of the moral community of humans and other beings with whom we share the world — and the reason AI systems cannot be admitted to it without gutting its meaning.
Midgley's diagnosis of the recurring cultural pattern — the clock, the engine, the computer, the language model — in which each century inflates its most impressive machine into a total explanation of reality.
The persistent intellectual vice — diagnosed by Midgley across six decades — of reducing complex phenomena to simple mechanisms and then declaring the reduction the explanation itself.
Midgley's homely image for the difference between surface resemblance and substantial identity — a distinction the AI discourse has nearly erased.
Midgley's insistence that a living being is not an assemblage of components — and that the properties that matter most are properties of the whole, not of any part.
Midgley's distinction between earned simplification and premature simplification — and her insistence that wisdom is the capacity to hold complexity rather than collapse it into formulas.
Neural networks trained on internet-scale text that have, since 2020, demonstrated emergent linguistic and reasoning capabilities — in Whitehead's vocabulary, computational systems whose prehensions of the textual corpus vastly exceed any i…
The class of machine-learning architectures loosely modeled on biological neurons — the substrate of the current AI revolution and the opposite of Asimov's designed-then-programmed positronic brain.