This page lists every Orange Pill Wiki entry hyperlinked from Juliet Schor — On AI. 18 entries total. Each is a deeper-dive on a person, concept, work, event, or technology that the book treats as a stepping stone for thinking through the AI revolution. Click any card to open the entry; in each entry, words colored in orange link to other Orange Pill Wiki entries, while orange-underlined words with the Wikipedia mark link to Wikipedia.
The Orange Pill's thesis that AI does not eliminate difficulty but relocates it to a higher cognitive floor — the engineer who no longer struggles with syntax struggles instead with architecture.
The Galbraithian concept — mobilized by Janah's framework and reactivated by the Muldoon study — that concentrated economic power generates its own counterweight through organized opposition, and that the counterweight is required for dig…
Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi's name for the condition of optimal human engagement — and, in Wiener's framework, the subjective signature of a well-regulated negative feedback system.
Segal's term for the gap between what a person can conceive and what they can produce — which AI collapsed to approximately the length of a conversation, and which Gopnik's framework reveals to be an exploitation metric that leaves the exp…
The Webbian proposition that the people who perform the work should have a voice in determining the conditions under which they perform it — the factory as a political space, not merely an economic one.
Schor's framework identifying five structural components — compensation structure, status hierarchy, career trajectory, cultural narrative, and absence of countervailing support — that together produce overwork as an institutional equilibr…
John Maynard Keynes's 1930 forecast in Economic Possibilities for Our Grandchildren that productivity growth would deliver a fifteen-hour workweek by 2030 — the foundational broken promise of industrial-era economics.
Schor's alternative economic model — articulated in True Wealth (2010) — organized not around the maximization of output but around sufficiency of output combined with expanded time, community, and sustainability.
The social mechanism by which knowledge-work cultures reward visible productive intensity — midnight shipping, weekend work, continuous availability — over outcomes, converting competition for status into competition for hours.
The Berkeley researchers' term for the colonization of previously protected temporal spaces by AI-accelerated work — the mechanism through which the recovery windows of pre-AI workflows disappear.
The institutional reform — piloted in Iceland, the UK, Portugal, and South Africa — that converts productivity gains into reduced hours at maintained pay, treating the workweek as a design variable rather than a natural constant.
The specific behavioral configuration — compulsive AI-augmented engagement experienced as exhilaration from within and pathology from without — produced by a reinforcing loop without a balancing counterpart.
Schor's term for the phantom leisure that productivity gains make arithmetically possible but institutions fail to deliver — the hours that could have been freed and were absorbed instead.
Schor's four-stage mechanism by which productivity gains are systematically converted into more consumption and more work rather than more leisure — the engine that has absorbed every previous technological dividend.