Nussbaum's career-spanning claim that the things human beings value most are valuable precisely because they can be lost — the fragility is constitutive of the good, not a defect.
The central conviction animating Nussbaum's philosophical project is that love which could not be lost would not be love, craft which could not be rendered obsolete would not be craft, commitment immune to testing would not be commitment. The vulnerability of valued things is not a flaw to be engineered away but the constitutive feature that makes them valuable. This thesis, developed through sustained reading of Greek tragedy and sustained argument with the Platonic tradition, generates the most precise philosophical instrument available for evaluating the AI transition: a framework that refuses both the triumphalist's denial of loss and the elegist's denial of gain.
The Vulnerability of the Good (Nussbaum's Thesis)
In The You On AI Field Guide
The Greek tragedians understood that the world contains genuine goods depending on conditions external to the moral agent — conditions the agent cannot control. Priam's goodness did not protect Troy. Hecuba's devotion did not protect her children. The Chorus in Agamemnon warns that no mortal should