Processual Sociology

In the AI Story

The orientation has implications that extend beyond abstract theory into practical guidance for practitioners navigating transitions. If the professional system is always in process, then the practitioner's relationship to it is not that of a passenger on a fixed track but of a participant in ongoing negotiation. Practitioners do not merely occupy jurisdictions—they actively construct them through daily choices about what work to take on, what capabilities to develop, what relationships to build, what standards to uphold. The AI disruption has made this constructive work more visible and more urgent, but it has not created it. Practitioners have always been builders of their own jurisdictions; the disruption has simply made the building more conscious.

The framework connects to Abbott's methodological contributions, particularly his founding of sequence analysis as a social-science methodology. Sequence analysis studies the patterns through which processes unfold over time—the ordering of events, the recurring trajectories, the branching points where different paths become possible. It is a methodology designed for a world in process, where understanding requires attention to how things happen rather than merely to what they become. The approach has found application in fields ranging from career research to historical analysis to the study of biographical trajectories.

Processual sociology also has affinities with concurrent developments in philosophy, particularly Alfred North Whitehead's process philosophy and the pragmatist tradition of William James and John Dewey. What distinguishes Abbott's version is its empirical rigor—the insistence that processual claims must be grounded in careful historical analysis rather than metaphysical assertion. Abbott's processual sociology is not a philosophy of becoming but a methodology for studying how becoming actually occurs in specific institutional contexts.

Applied to the AI transition, processual sociology offers both analytical precision and existential reassurance. Professional identity is not a fixed possession but an ongoing process—a career, in Abbott's technical sense, that accumulates meaning through choices, developments, and plans. The AI disruption does not destroy a fixed identity. It interrupts a process and forces redirection. The redirection is painful, but the process itself—the capacity for professional development, for learning, for accumulating new competencies—remains intact. Practitioners are not starting from zero; they are redirecting careers that have already built capacities yet to be fully recognized.

Origin

Abbott developed processual sociology across decades of work, synthesizing it most fully in his 2016 book Processual Sociology. The orientation reflects his training in the Chicago tradition, his founding of sequence analysis, and his extensive historical research on professional evolution.

Key Ideas

Process, not structure. Social reality is constantly making and remaking itself through participant actions, not existing as a fixed structure.

Active construction. Practitioners build their jurisdictions through daily choices; they do not merely occupy pre-existing positions.

Sequence analysis. The methodological counterpart studies how processes unfold over time through ordering, recurrence, and branching.

Career as process. Professional identity is an ongoing developmental trajectory that can be redirected when conditions change.