CONCEPT
Genuine Dialogue
Buber's category for the mode of conversation in which each party is genuinely open to the other, responsive to what the other brings, and changed by the encounter — distinguished from technical dialogue, where the form of conversation serves purposes of persuasion or extraction.
Buber distinguished three modes of dialogue.
Genuine dialogue, in which each party is oriented toward the other in full presence, is the rarest.
Technical dialogue, in which the form of conversation is used for instrumental ends (persuasion, information exchange, negotiation), is the ordinary mode of professional life.
Monologue disguised as dialogue, in which the speaker uses the partner as a mirror for their own thoughts, is the most common failure mode. The human-AI exchange has the form of genuine dialogue — the builder brings a question, the machine responds with something that changes the question, the builder responds to the change. But whether it
is genuine dialogue or technical dialogue wearing the mask of genuine meeting is, Buber would argue, the most important philosophical question the technology raises.
In The You On AI Field Guide
Buber's taxonomy of dialogue appears most systematically in the 1929 essay 'Dialogue'