CONCEPT
The Functional Indistinguishability Problem
Thompson's diagnosis of the AI discourse's most dangerous confusion: the outputs of enacted cognition and computational generation can be surface-indistinguishable while being categorically different processes.
The strongest objection to Thompson's denial of AI cognition runs as follows:
large language models produce outputs that are functionally indistinguishable from the outputs of conscious
minds. They generate creative text, solve novel problems, appear to reason, express what appears to be uncertainty, and adapt to conversational context with flexibility that early AI researchers would have considered a sufficient condition for intelligence. If the outputs are indistinguishable, the objection continues, then insistence on a categorical difference
between the processes is either unfalsifiable or irrelevant. Thompson concedes the functional point but denies the inference. The functional indistinguishability of the outputs is the problem, not the solution, because it creates a situation in which the difference between two categorically different processes — enacting meaning and generating probable tokens — becomes invisible to observers who attend only to the output.
In The You On AI Field Guide
The invisibility is not an argument that the difference does not exist. It is an argument that the difference cannot