Korczak edited two children's newspapers. The first was the internal Dom Sierot publication, in which orphans wrote articles about life at the institution. The second, Mały Przegląd (The Little Review), founded in 1926, was a weekly national newspaper in which children across Poland submitted articles, editorials, and correspondence on their own lives and the world beyond them. Korczak edited with a deliberately light hand. The articles were uneven, as writing by children tends to be. Some were perceptive; some were trivial; some were complaints about food. Korczak did not edit for quality because the newspaper's purpose was not to produce good journalism. Its purpose was to give children the experience of having a voice that reached beyond the immediate conversation — a voice that persisted in text, could be read and responded to, carried the weight of publication.
The newspaper's function was specific and structural. It created a public for children — a community of readers who would respond to what the children wrote, treat their observations seriously, and reflect those observations back. The child who published an article had the experience of being heard not in the ephemeral way of conversation but in the durable way of text. Her observation became a contribution to an ongoing community self-understanding. This is a developmental experience no platform engagement can replicate, because platform engagement treats the child as a producer of content for algorithmic optimization rather than as a voice within a community.
The contrast with the contemporary child's digital experience is sharp. The child of 2026 produces content constantly — videos, posts, comments — into feeds shaped by recommendation algorithms optimized for engagement rather than response. Her output enters a stream in which visibility is determined by metrics she cannot see. The "public" that receives her content is not a community deliberating about her observations but an aggregate of impressions optimized for time-on-platform. The newspaper is replaced by the feed. The experience is different in kind.
AI-assisted writing compounds the distortion. The child's written output is increasingly produced with AI polishing. The observation may be hers; the formulation may not. The language has been smoothed beyond recognition by a tool that produces grammatically perfect prose regardless of whether the child has something genuine to say. The premature answer has colonized expression. The child's voice — the specific texture of her thinking as she was working it out — is replaced by the tool's competent equivalent.
Mały Przegląd ran weekly from 1926 to 1939, ceasing publication with the German invasion of Poland. It survived thirteen years as a paying enterprise on the premise that children's observations were worth publishing on a national scale. The archive — available in digital form — remains one of the richest historical records of children's political, social, and moral reasoning in the twentieth century.
The Dom Sierot newspaper was established in the orphanage's earliest years. Mały Przegląd was founded in 1926 as a Friday supplement to the Polish-Jewish daily Nasz Przegląd, with Korczak as editor. The paper accepted contributions from any Polish child and paid writers for their work. Circulation in the early 1930s approached 50,000 copies weekly. The archive was partially preserved through the war and has been digitized in the twenty-first century.
Publication vs. feed. The newspaper created a public of readers; the feed creates an aggregate of impressions optimized for platform metrics.
Voice that persists. Publication gives a child's observation permanence and accountability that ephemeral communication cannot.
Editorial light hand. Korczak's refusal to edit for quality protected the children's actual voices — a principle AI-assisted writing systematically violates.
National scale. Mały Przegląd demonstrated that children's public voice can be taken seriously at civilizational scale, not only within the walls of an institution.