WORK
Alchemy and AI
The 1965 RAND paper in which Dreyfus first argued that the entire AI research program rested on a philosophical mistake—a provocation that made him a pariah and whose central claim was vindicated by the collapse of symbolic AI.
Alchemy and AI, published by Dreyfus at the RAND Corporation in 1965, was the opening salvo of a five-decade philosophical campaign. The paper argued that the researchers building chess programs, theorem provers, and natural language parsers at MIT, Stanford, and Carnegie Mellon had assumed, without argument, that human intelligence consists of manipulating symbolic representations according to formal rules. Dreyfus called this assumption demonstrably false and predicted that everything built on it would collapse under problems it could not solve. The AI community's response was hostile—Seymour Papert wrote a rebuttal titled 'A Budget of Fallacies,' and researchers circulated jokes. The hostility was diagnostic: Dreyfus had attacked not a research program but a worldview. By the 1990s, AI historian Daniel Crevier acknowledged the accuracy of Dreyfus's predictions.
In The You On AI Field Guide
The title itself was designed to provoke. Comparing the AI research program to alchemy implied that contemporary researchers were pursuing, with modern tools,