PERSON

James Baldwin

The Harlem-born novelist and essayist whose lifelong interrogation of who is seen and who is rendered invisible, whose language counts as correct, and what a civilization owes to the truths it refuses to face makes him the most morally precise lens available for a moment when machines trained on biased history are mistaken for objectivity.

Baldwin's signature move—refusing the consoling abstraction and insisting on the concrete particular—is exactly the move required when a loan-denial algorithm is defended as merely statistical, when a face-recognition system's errors are called an engineering footnote, or when a large language model's confident confabulations are explained as a minor quirk of training data. He understood that the accumulated record of a civilization is not a neutral substrate: it is a selection, made by those with the power to record, reflecting the world as their position allowed them to see it, which is to say it leaves out almost everything that mattered to the people beneath them. A machine trained on that record does not inherit neutrality; it inherits the record's evasions, and presenting the reproduction as objective is the oldest trick in the book. Against [YOU] on AI's celebration of

Keep reading with YOU ON AI