Cognitive Occupation

Gregg identified the smartphone as imposing a cognitive tax on domestic presence — a constant, low-grade deduction from attentional resources produced by the device's latent capacity to demand attention at any moment. The tax operated through anticipation rather than actual demand: the phone on the coffee table altered the quality of the living room even when silent. AI tools compound this tax into something more accurately described as cognitive occupation — a tax imposed not by external threat but by internal awareness of unrealized productive potential. The smartphone taxed presence through the possibility of interruption from outside; AI taxes presence through the knowledge of capability from inside. The shift matters because internal awareness cannot be addressed through the physical boundary-setting that constituted the primary counter-practice of the smartphone era.