The habitual pattern of grasping at a single interpretation to escape the discomfort of not-knowing — defended not because it is accurate but because the certainty it provides is preferable to vertigo.
In Buddhist psychology, the four maras are habitual patterns that function as exit strategies from the present moment — not demons in the literal sense but recurring mechanisms through which the mind flees difficulty. The mara of fixed views is the pattern of seizing a single interpretation of an ambiguous situation and defending it against complicating evidence, not because the interpretation is correct but because the certainty it offers is psychologically preferable to the groundlessness of genuine uncertainty. Pema Chödrön teaches that fixed views are particularly seductive during periods of rapid change, when the dissolution of familiar structures produces vertigo and the mind grasps at any narrative that restores the sense of solid ground. Both triumphalist certainty ('AI is unambiguously good') and elegiac certainty ('AI is unambiguously destructive') function as fixed views — each contains partial truth, each provides psychological relief, and each prevents the fuller seeing that remaining in the ambiguity would allow.