The structural condition — historically unprecedented — under which the most attention-degrading channel in a person's environment is also the most genuinely valuable, collapsing every classical argument for disconnection.
For two decades, the case for digital disconnection rested on an asymmetry: the channels competing for attention were, in the main, not worth the cognitive cost they extracted. Notifications were trivial. Emails were administrative sediment. The case for protecting deep work was the case for filtering noise. AI has eliminated this asymmetry. When the monitored channel is a creative collaboration generating valuable output at every prompt, the builder who steps away is not protecting her attention from noise — she is withdrawing it from signal. The rational case for continued engagement is stronger than the rational case for disengagement, and the strength of that case is not an illusion. It is an accurate assessment of the channel's value. This is the structural novelty Stone identifies as historically unprecedented.
When Every Channel Is Productive
In The You On AI Field Guide
Every previous version of continuous partial attention was sustained, at least in part, by distortion. The fear of missing the occasional signal in a sea