Workers who apply temporary fixes to problems that should not exist — the human bridges between incompatible systems whose existence reveals organizational dysfunction that no one has fixed.
Duct-tapers patch institutional dysfunction. The employee manually transferring data between systems that were never designed to communicate. The administrator reconciling reports that should have been generated automatically. The IT specialist whose job is to make legacy systems pretend to talk to modern ones. Graeber recognized duct-taping as both genuinely skilled and genuinely absurd — skilled because patching requires real competence, absurd because the patching would be unnecessary if anyone fixed the underlying problem. AI presents the duct-taper with the most direct existential threat in the taxonomy. The technology can integrate the systems, eliminate the paperwork, dissolve the seams. The question is whether the institutional structure permits the elimination — or merely automates the patch while preserving the dysfunction it patches.
The Duct-Taper
In The You On AI Field Guide
The duct-taper occupies a position of paradoxical knowledge. Years of patching produce intimate understanding of where systems leak, why they leak, and what breaks when one part is fixed without fixing the connected parts. This knowledge is architectural, viewed from