The market's failure during the SaaSpocalypse to distinguish between companies whose value derives from code (threatened) and companies whose value derives from ecosystems (durable) — a uniform repricing across heterogeneous moat structures.
The category error names the specific analytical failure that produced the SaaSpocalypse opportunity. The market correctly recognized that AI had structurally weakened the difficulty-of-building moat that protected software company valuations. It then applied this recognition uniformly across the SaaS sector, repricing every company as though the code-devaluation narrative captured its entire value structure. The error: this narrative captures the entire value structure of code-dependent companies but only a minority fraction of the value structure of ecosystem-dependent companies. Treating them identically generates a uniform discount that is approximately right in aggregate (the Net Zero Thesis) and dramatically wrong company-by-company. The aggregate trillion-dollar repricing concealed enormous dispersion: code companies may still be overvalued; ecosystem companies are substantially undervalued; the difference is the alpha available to the analyst who can decompose the category.
The Category Error Worth a Trillion Dollars
In The You On AI Field Guide
Category errors of this type are the historical pattern in technology corrections. The dot-com bust repriced