Immordino-Yang and Damasio's 2007 paper establishing that emotion is not peripheral to learning but constitutive of it — the neurological refutation of the Enlightenment model of dispassionate cognition.
The paper argued that the brain does not store information neutrally but encodes it in relation to its emotional significance — its relevance to the organism's goals, its connection to the learner's developing sense of self, its felt importance within the project of being alive. Learning that lacks emotional engagement produces a qualitatively different kind of knowledge: information stored but not integrated, accessible but not understood. The title inverts Descartes's cogito to signal the paper's ambition: to replace the model of cognition as dispassionate calculation with a framework in which feeling and thinking are dimensions of a single process, woven together at the level of neural architecture. The finding carries direct implications for AI-augmented education, where frictionless information delivery threatens to eliminate the emotional engagement that transforms information into understanding.
We Feel, Therefore We Learn
In The You On AI Field Guide
The Enlightenment model of cognition — still dominating most educational institutions and most technology companies — holds that the best thinking is dispassionate thinking.