Perspectivism is the practical discipline that enables relationism. Where relationism names the goal — the disciplined integration of partial perspectives into more comprehensive understanding — perspectivism names the method: the careful specification of what each position sees and does not see, grounded in the analysis of the social conditions that produce the position.
Applied to the AI discourse, perspectivism maps each position to its social location and asks what each reveals. The triumphalist perspective reveals the genuine expansion of capability; it obscures the distribution of gains. The elegist perspective reveals the genuine cost of that expansion; it obscures the partiality of the expertise class's own privilege. The silent middle reveals the irreducibility of the contradiction; it obscures the perspectives of those who cannot afford the middle position.
The method is demanding because it resists the comfort of either taking a side or declaring all sides equivalent. It requires sustained attention to the specific epistemic contribution of each position — what it knows by virtue of where it stands — and to the specific blindness each position imposes.
Mannheim's perspectivism developed in dialogue with Nietzsche's epistemological perspectivism and Ortega y Gasset's doctrina del punto de vista, but its distinctive contribution was the sociological grounding. Individual perspectives are secondary products; primary perspectives are those of social groups, structured by their shared conditions of existence.
Social before individual. Perspectives are primarily class, professional, or generational — only derivatively individual.
Specificity over generality. The method requires specification of what each position reveals and conceals.
Reflexive application. The analyst's own perspective must be specified with the same discipline.
Not relativism. Different perspectives are not equivalent — each has specific epistemic content.
Enables relationism. Perspectivism is the working method; relationism is the goal.