CONCEPT
General vs. Specific Human Capital
Becker's 1964 taxonomic distinction between skills portable across employers and contexts (general) and skills valuable only within a particular firm, industry, or technology (specific) — now the sharpest diagnostic instrument for who AI devastates and who it liberates.
General
human capital consists of skills and knowledge portable across employers and contexts: communication, reasoning, the capacity to learn new domains quickly, the judgment that
Edo Segal calls taste. Specific human capital consists of skills and knowledge valuable only within a particular firm, industry, or technological context: mastery of a proprietary codebase, expertise in a framework that may be superseded, deep familiarity with the authority structures and institutional knowledge of a specific organization. Becker demonstrated that specific capital commands a premium precisely because it is not portable. The firm values it because it cannot be replicated by hiring someone off the street. The worker values it because it represents a relationship — an accumulation of knowledge about
this particular system,
this team,
this way of doing things — that took years to build and cannot be transferred.
In The You On AI Field Guide
The non-portability that makes specific capital