By Edo Segal ^ Opus
The error that haunts me most is not the one Claude made. It is the one I almost missed because the output was too clean to question.
I described this in *You On AI* — the passage where Claude attributed a concept to Deleuze that sounded right, read beautifully, and was wrong in a way that only someone who had actually read Deleuze would catch. "Confident wrongness dressed in good prose," I called it. The smoothness concealed the fracture. I nearly kept it. That near-miss changed how I think about everything we are building.
But it did not give me a framework for understanding *why* the smoothness is dangerous at scale. For that, I needed a historian who spent her career studying what happens when a civilization's entire system for producing and
A reading-companion catalog of the 15 Orange Pill Wiki entries linked from this book — the people, ideas, works, and events that Elizabeth Eisenstein — On AI uses as stepping stones for thinking through the AI revolution.
Open the Wiki Companion →