By Edo Segal
The passage I almost kept was the one that convinced me.
I describe the moment in *You On AI* — Claude produced a connection so elegant, so structurally illuminating, that I read it twice and moved on. The next morning, something nagged. I checked. The philosophical reference was wrong in a way that would have been obvious to anyone who had actually read the source material. The prose had been perfect. The insight had been hollow. And the perfection was precisely what made the hollowness invisible.
I called it "confident wrongness dressed in good prose." I thought that was a sufficient diagnosis. It is not.
Jean Baudrillard spent forty years studying what happens when representations become so convincing that the question of
A reading-companion catalog of the 28 Orange Pill Wiki entries linked from this book — the people, ideas, works, and events that Jean Baudrillard — On AI uses as stepping stones for thinking through the AI revolution.
Open the Wiki Companion →