CONCEPT
Vigilance, Denunciation, and Evaluation
The three counter-democratic powers: watching those who govern, naming abuses publicly, and judging governance quality—structurally disabled by AI's opacity, the atomization of harm, and absent evaluation standards.
In
Rosanvallon's framework, these are the three practices through which citizens exercise sovereignty
between elections. Vigilance is continuous monitoring of authority-holders through institutional mechanisms: free press, transparency laws,
civil society organizations, whistleblower protections. Denunciation is the public naming of abuses and failures, requiring a
public sphere where naming can reach an audience large
enough to generate democratic pressure. Evaluation is ongoing assessment of whether governance produces outcomes the governed have the right to expect, requiring shared standards against which performance can be measured. The AI transition has structurally disabled all three: vigilance is blinded by technological opacity (citizens cannot see training data, audit models, evaluate alignment), denunciation is atomized (individual workers experience displacement individually, preventing aggregation into collective narratives), and evaluation lacks standards (no agreed criteria for assessing whether an AI company is governing its technology democratically).
In The You On AI Field Guide
These powers have deep historical roots. Vigilance descended from the French Revolution's popular societies and political clubs functioning as