You On AI Field Guide · Narrative as Evidence The You On AI Field Guide Home
Txt Low Med High
CONCEPT

Narrative as Evidence

The methodological argument — central to phronetic social science — that first-person, context-rich, value-laden accounts constitute evidence of the most consequential kind for phenomena whose essential features are context-dependent and judgment-laden.
Narrative as evidence is Flyvbjerg's methodological claim that case-based, first-person accounts are not anecdote to be superseded by statistical aggregation but evidence of a categorically different kind, best suited to phenomena that resist abstraction. The epistemic paradigm classifies narrative as preliminary — interesting illustrations awaiting the real work of quantitative generalization. Flyvbjerg's career-long argument is that for phronetic phenomena, narrative is not preliminary but terminal: it is the form of evidence adequate to the phenomenon, and the attempt to abstract it into generalizable regularities destroys precisely the features that made it informative. Segal's You On AI — with its confessions, its specific cases, its author's willingness to render his own experience with contextual honesty — is, on this framework, the richest available evidence about what AI is doing to human work.
Narrative as Evidence
Narrative as Evidence

In The You On AI Field Guide

Aristotle's original argument supplies the philosophical foundation: the phronimos learns not from rules but from cases. The cases do not dictate the right

← Home 0%
CONCEPT Book →

Keep reading with YOU ON AI

Unlock the full book, 10,000+ field-guide entries, and a 1000+ thinker library. If you have a book code, register now — it takes a minute.

Register with book code Sign in