Langer's thesis that limits experienced as permanent features of reality are often conditional products of categories accepted as absolute—the walls of the fishbowl rendered invisible by familiarity.
The limits that knowledge workers accepted as permanent features of their professional capabilities were real in their effects but conditional in their nature. The person who believed she could not code did not merely fail to attempt coding; she organized her entire cognitive relationship to technology around the assumption that coding was beyond her. The wall was not climbed. It was revealed as contingent—a product of conditions, not of nature. The language interface demonstrated this with uncomfortable directness. The limits were real in their operation, unreal in their permanence.
The Illusion of Fixed Limits
In The You On AI Field Guide
The illusion operates in both directions. There is the illusion that limits are more fixed than they are—the designer who believed he could not build when the only thing preventing him was a category. And there is the less discussed but equally dangerous illusion that limits have been more fully dissolved than they have—the novice who uses AI to produce a working prototype and concludes