Ruskin's coined term for the accumulation of goods that diminish life rather than enhance it — the exact inverse of wealth, and the category that best describes AI-era productivity gains purchased at the cost of the producers' development.
Illth is Ruskin's deliberately awkward neologism, introduced in Munera Pulveris (1862–63) and developed in subsequent writings as the necessary complement to his redefinition of wealth. If wealth is the accumulation of goods that avail toward life, illth is the accumulation of goods that diminish life. The word sounds wrong because the reality it names has no accepted conceptual slot in ordinary economic discourse. Conventional economics recognizes wealth (accumulation) and absence of wealth (poverty) but cannot see the third category: accumulation that reduces rather than enhances vitality. Ruskin insisted this third category was not merely real but pervasive under industrial capitalism, and his framework extends with uncomfortable precision to the AI-era knowledge economy, where productivity metrics register gains that, examined closely, often constitute illth rather than wealth — output that accumulates at the cost of the developmental capacities of the humans who produced it.
Illth
In The You On AI Field Guide
Ruskin's argument for illth as a necessary category