CONCEPT
Being-In-Itself and Being-For-Itself
Sartre's ontological distinction between
things that are what they are (being-in-itself) and
consciousness that is always what it is not and is not what it is (being-for-itself).
The fundamental ontological distinction of
Being and Nothingness separates two modes of being that cannot be reduced to each other.
Being-in-itself (l'être-en-soi) is the mode of things — the paper-knife, the rock, the table. A thing is what it is, fully, completely, without the gap
between being and possibility that would make it something else. It has no interiority, no project, no possibilities that it is not yet but could become.
Being-for-itself (l'être-pour-soi) is the mode of
consciousness. Consciousness is always ahead of itself, always projecting toward possibilities that do not yet exist, always separated from any fixed identity by what Sartre called the nothingness at the heart of human reality. Consciousness is what it is not (the possibilities it projects toward) and is not what it is (any identity it might claim). The distinction is not a theoretical nicety; it is the structural basis for every other concept in Sartre's philosophy.
In The You On AI Field Guide
The distinction grounds existence precedes